A major diplomatic confrontation has unfolded at the United Nations as Russia vetoed a British-backed Security Council resolution calling for a ceasefire in Sudan’s devastating civil war. The move sparked sharp criticism from Western powers while highlighting deep international divisions over the conflict’s resolution.
The proposed resolution, co-sponsored by Sierra Leone, sought immediate cessation of hostilities between Sudan’s army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), emphasizing civilian protection particularly in Darfur. The conflict has claimed thousands of lives and displaced over 11 million people since April 2022, creating what aid workers describe as the world’s worst humanitarian crisis.
Sudan’s representative cited omissions in the draft, including desired clauses condemning alleged external support for the RSF and its classification as a terrorist organization. Russia defended its veto by criticizing Western intervention in Sudanese affairs, accusing former colonial powers of advancing their agenda without respecting sovereignty.
The diplomatic impasse occurs against a backdrop of deteriorating humanitarian conditions, with aid workers warning of imminent famine risks. Both military factions face accusations of potential war crimes, complicating international response efforts.
The failed resolution attempt underscores broader challenges in addressing Sudan’s crisis through multilateral channels. Despite unanimous support from fourteen Security Council members, the single veto prevented adoption, highlighting institutional limitations in responding to urgent humanitarian crises.